JACKSON BROWNE
 Fan Letters & Reviews

August 2008


GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I just spent over an hour earler trying to get some Jackson Browne tickets. I actually went over to the Warner theater a half hour earlier and tried to purchase 2 tickets. The box office had just opened and there were NO orchestra seats. I seriously question the happenings in the ticket world with music and other event tickets today. How could all of the orchestra be previously sold out before the tickets actually go on sale?

My advice to anybody wanting to see Jackson this fall is stay in your office or your home and pay the extra price to ticketmaster. I'm furious to take the time out of my day for such a turn of event.

Good luck!

Submitted by: sunnyoutlook@hotmail.com (Mary J.)
Webmaster's Reply:

Hi Mary,

I am sorry to hear about your frustration with the ticket buying process.

I have heard from many people on this issue, both this week and back during the spring solo acoustic tour. The reports have been very mixed. Someone just reported that they got front row center tickets during the online pre-sales and coldn't believe that a real fan was able to get such seats! So there are some happy stories about tickets sales. I used the pre-sale process myself during the spring tour and managed to pick up a seat in the second row, although off to the side quite a bit.

I will agree with your point about not going to the box office in most cases. From what I've heard, that is often the place for the worst tickets during the initial sales period. On the other hand, some box offices end up with some great seats closer to the show or sometimes even the day of the show, if your timing is lucky.

The current process of pre-sales and regular sales through Ticketmaster is far from perfect. But at least Jackson is attempting to get some seats out to his biggest fans through the pre-sale process. (Some artists are actually forcing their fans to purchase an expensive fan club membership to have this opportunity!)

Purchasing concert tickets has never been an easy thing. I remember waiting overnight in line to get tickets for shows back in the '70s. Today I'm much happier just to sit at the computer a few minutes before they go on sale...

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi Russ,

First thanks so much for all you do with your site. I've not written in years, but check your site no less than every few days to get the latest and accurate information on all things Jackson. Tickets went on sale at 1000 yesterday morning. While at work, I got on ticket master at 0959 and 1002 trying to get two "best available" tickets and the best available at that time was upper balcony. I've seen Jackson over 40 times since I was a 15 year old back in 1983, and decided there has got to be a way to get better seats than this. I ended up not buying the upper balcony and will refer to the Guacamole Fund website for those seats or simply wait closer to the concert and try and scoop up some tickets via this website from someone who can't attend. Anyway, I completely share Mary's frustration and 'am sure there has to be a better way to get good tickets. Thanks for all your efforts through the years Russ!

Regards,

Submitted by: kennedykd@comcast.net (Dan K.)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi

Just like to share with you my satisfaction with the ticketing at The Sage in Gateshead where a week or so ago I had dropped in,in the hope that the tickets were released,they weren't but on friday morning last week they as promised phoned and I went down and got prime seats for both nights. I also phoned and got seats for The Albert Hall without any problems however being unfamiliar with the seating there I've taken seats they suggested, roll on next spring.

Submitted by: paul.jamesnewcastle@yahoo.co.uk (Paul J., Newcastle upon Tyne)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Russ; just wanted to let you know I ordered pre-sale tickets for Jackson's concert in Minneapolis through Ticketmaster today without any problems.

I know ordering tickets can be a problem for some and this venue is quite small, so I feel very fortunate. (I had to buy the new CD too, but I was going to get it anyway). I am really looking forward to the show!!! Thank you SO MUCH for the work on the website.

Submitted by: gmkbew@bevcomm.net (Kevin in Minnesota)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I also find it strange that for the Phoenix show, like week before, if you went to any of the "ticket sites", they were advertising quite a few seats for sale. The tickets did not go on sale for the so called pre sale until 10 am Phoenix time today. I ended up breaking in and buying tickets thru one of the sites, Stub Hub, and for 4 seats, 5th row, left side of stage, it cost $725.00. Now to me, Jackson is a good show and the only reason I spent this kind of money is because I want my children to experience Jackson before it is too late and I refuse to sit a distance from the stage. I saw Dan Fogelberg about 15 - 16 years ago and now I'll never get the chance. To me it is worth it, some what, becausr you never know what tommorrow brings. I paid just about the same amount as I paid for the acoustic show in April @ Ikeda in Mesa. I have know complaints as I took my 14 year old son and to see the look on his face when Jackson opened with "Barricades of Heaven", my son's favorite, was worth every penny and then some. Priceless! Sure its a lot of money and I dont agree with how we are getting stuck but we arent etting any younger and neither is Jackson. I hope to see some of you in Phoenix. Thanks for letting me ramble.

Submitted by: harlan.wally@verizon.net (JLW)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I am only 16 years old and have been in love with JB's music for as long as I can remember. I, along with my father & family, am throughly disappointed Jackson is not making any planned stops in Chicago during the upcoming Time the Conqueror tour.

I have never had the privilege to see the man that shaped my whole perspective of music in action. Who knows when his next tour may be after this and how he will compare to his live recordings after so many long years.

Submitted by: darbsugab7@yahoo.com
Webmaster's Reply:

Jackson Browne will be doing a more extensive tour of the U.S. next summer, so hopefully he will be in your area then.

Thanks for writing.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Just paid $500 through the Guacamole Fund for two tix to see Jackson in Grand Praire Tx of all places--somewhere up by Dallas. Sure wish he'd see fit to come to Austin. I've never paid so much for tickets--

Can't wait to hear the new music!

Submitted by: dmjohnson@bazzirk.com (Donna)
Webmaster's Reply:

Hi Donna,

Ordering tickets through the Guacamole Fund is definitely expensive. But the seats are good and the money goes to an excellent cause.

Enjoy the show.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Am I shocked to hear that Jackson Brown would sue McCain over the use of a song.. Sad very Sad.I would think nice he picked that one. Good job. Please rethink that sue thing we are sue happy and with all the bad crap we hear about so called celebrates and Stars in the news it gets sickening.I would think Brown has more class than to stoop to this. Let it go. I like to hear the song on any occasion but if he sues I will not listen or respect him any more. It gets old.Can't we just all get along. This is exactly what is wrong with this world. Someone out to get someone all the time. I think the ad was in fun and really does make a point. But of course if the God Obama used it it would probably be just let alone. This country is in such turmoil. Lets have some people do the right thing. I do not believe all Jackson stands for but I like him as a musician and not bad press. so lets keep it that way.I Am someone who wants everyone to just take a breath. I can not handle another nice person to go to the other side of crap. Let it go. Be the better person. It did not hurt anything. Be happy he used yours...

Submitted by: se8332@yahoo.com (Sherry)
Webmaster's Reply:

Hi Sherry,

Thank you for the letter. While I understand your feelings on this, I respectfully disagree.

As a public figure, Jackson has worked hard for many years to develop a certain image, and this image is a part of his overall marketing, sales, reputation, and public persona. The use of Jackson's music implies an endorsement. Endorsing McCain goes contrary to many years of social activism and fundraising by Jackson and is certainly harmful to his public reputation as he has developed it over the past 40+ years.

Jackson Browne has done benefits for the Democratic Party for decades and has supported Democratic Party candidates as recently as the current election. (Although I don't recall him ever officially endorsing Senator Obama.)

John McCain's campaign arrogantly used Jackson's song without permission, with no regard for Jackson's copyright, no regard for his image, and no regard for the law. SOMEONE needs to stand up to people like that and I am glad that Jackson is doing so.

Just my opinion.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Your advice to Sherry is "Bogus". While I would never boycot him or his music, I agree with her that Lawyers and their big time clients are sue happy. I think he has a right to his views, but going for the publicity is beneith him. He should be glad an American Hero likes his music. Did he have his bones broken serving his country? NO, he just writes, and sings beautiful songs. It's hard when your hero's make statements, and generally act like "Jane Fonda". Why buy his music? We can all buy "Toby Keith" albums.

Submitted by: jswift9120@charter.net (Joseph in South Carolina)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I've been a fan for years, but the news today that Browne is suing the McCain campaign over misuse of one of his songs is ridiculous. I was going to see him at the Warner Theater in Washington, DC on September 15th, however, that ticket will now go in the trash. That's right I paid, and it's my choice what to do with it. See ya Browne, It was nice while it lasted.

Submitted by: juanita.johnson@sutherland.com




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I am so disappointed in Jackson Browne over this issue. Enough of frivolous law suits! And I don't care if it had been Obama or McCain. Enough bull cr*p over unimportant, trivial matters. Shame on you Jackson Browne.

Submitted by: ksanders@mhartexpress.com
Webmaster's Reply:

I think you are missing the point. Jackson Browne is a professional musician. He makes his living by creating music and selling it.

When directors of movies or television want to include a song in their creations, they take the time to get the permission from the owner of that song to use it in their productions. They pay for this right, as they should.

John McCain's campaign failed to get permission for their use of Jackson's song. They stole it. If Jackson fails enforce his ownership, the music would become public property and he would lose his ability to make a living off of his songs.

I'm honestly surprised at all the people who don't believe that Jackson should stand up for his rights.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Please congratulate Jackson on his suit against McCain and the Ohio and National RNC. Good luck for a successful outcome. Thanks for standing up for what is right!!!

Submitted by: marynjoe@cox.net (Mary & Joe)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I support and applaud Jackson's decision to sue McCain. It is obviously not for the money, he is making a point. "Running on Empty" means so much to many of us early Jackson Brown fans and for one politician to use it to put down another maligns it's meaning. McCain is using it in a public forum for which he should have paid to do so - that's the legal way, I believe. I have been a fan for well over 30 years and while I have never met Jackson Brown, I feel like I know him from listening to his music and attending many of his concerts. McCain's use of his very personal music is an insult. You go, Mr. Brown!

Submitted by: kathleen.minarik@choa.org (Kathy - Atlanta)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Kindly relate to Mr. Browne that this evening I shall take the compact discs of his music that I have played over the years and deposit them in the trash. If it is your wish, you can also relate this to his Los Angeles attorney. Entertainment and religion do not mix well with politics.

Submitted by: marnold@coconino.az.gov (Michael A.)
Webmaster's Reply:

Firstly, I don't believe that this is about politics. It's about enforcing a copyright ownership and standing up to stealing.

However, assuming that you'll never believe that, then I will also disagree with your assesment that "Entertainment and religion do not mix well with politics". On the contrary, there is a deep and profound connection between entertainment and politics in this country.

Great movies like the Oliver Stone film "Nixon" starring Anthony Hopkins and "Doctor Zhivago" starring Omar Sharif and Alec Guinness were based on political characters and backgrounds. Richard Attenborough's film "Gahndi" starring Ben Kingsley was heavily based in politics as was 1962's "The Manchurian Candidate" staring Frank Sinatra, Laurence Harvey, Janet Leigh and Angela Landsbury. The list is endless.

As for music, the depth of politics within the field of music is profound. Folk artists like The Weavers were blacklisted in the 1950s for their political connections, beliefs and lyrics. Bob Dylan and Joan Baez were defacto leaders of political movements in the 1960s due to their songs, lyrics and direct involvement wth political causes. (Political causes have been essential to folk artists going back at least to the days of Woody Guthrie.)

Of course, your CDs are yours and you are free to do whatever you want with them. If you don't want them any more, I'd suggest donating them to an orphanage or halfway house to benefit someone in need. Personally, I don't have to agree with an artist's politics to enjoy their music.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Havent checked in lately but had to comment on the lawsuit. I applaud Jackson for his strong opposition to the unauthorized use of his song for poitical purposes without receiving his approval. Things like enfringement and copyright issues dont matter. As usual, the Republican "rule of law" only applies when it is convenient for them. Its the kind of violations to our freedom that have occurred over the last eight years and are the types of issues that Jackson has been writing and singing about for years. Take care, Russ.

Submitted by: alfaella@yahoo.com (Al F.)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Russ,

You are absolutely right about Jackson's suing of McCain. It's a copyright issue. I've spent my entire career in video production. We would never think of violating a copyright without permission, for any purpose... let alone a political ad. I'm surprised at the reaction. Jackson has every right to protect what he owns.

Submitted by: dennis.flowers@constellation.com (Dennis)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I think you are promoting , putting your name forward for money . Any cause you supported , would be honored if you behaved , with gentleman common sense . The people who support John , a war veteran with honors , have removed the ad.

Submitted by: noahs0711@yahoo.com (Robin C.)
Webmaster's Reply:

I fail to see how Senator McCain's status as a war veteran with honors or as an American military hero (for which he deserves great respect) gives him the right to steal the copyrighted work of others.

Do you really believe that Jackson needs the money that badly? $75,000? It wouldn't surprise me if he ends up donating it to a charity.

Also, it is my understanding that the ad was not removed until after the law suit was filed. Requests prior to the suit brought no results.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Just like an opening from a well known sports commentator would say: "Here's a guy who hasn't had a hit in years, and he's suing someone for use of his music."

Seems to me he should get paid for use of his song by all means. Who cares who is for John or for Barack? The chips will fall where they may in November anyways. Gives me one more reason to think someone is way to full of themselves after their fifteen minutes have long gone by..............

Knowing that one will raise my taxes and be more socialist is where we need to look anyhow! That's where intelligence comes in Mr.

Submitted by: cyberdoc@ameritech.net




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Russ... I'm glad that "Kevin in Minnesota" had a good ticket buying experience this week with the "pre-sale" tickets for JB's show at the Orpheum Theater. I got CR*P. I was in the Ticketmaster website ordering tickets IMMEDIATELY at 10am on 8/12 when they went on sale. I asked for "best available" at the top price and got SECOND section in the balcony at the lower price. I am SO disappointed and can't help but wonder how so many tickets sold out that fast (even if it is a smaller venue).......I HATE dealing with Ticketmaster....what a racket.

Jackson is my very, very, very favorite artist on the planet - sure wish I could of gotten better seats since I couldn't have been any quicker in my attempt to do so. I was absolutely in shock at 10:03 when the seats came up so far back. Sure, I am VERY excited about the new cd and very glad I have tix for the show but not happy about my seats at all. Kevin (you lucky dog)....any helpful hints for next time??????

Submitted by: hcntown@comcast.net (Carrie in MN)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Rather then take the suing route immediately, I feel it would have been more appropriate if Jackson would have insisted that the McCain campaign stop using "Running On Empty" immediately. In addition, the question remains, if the Obama campaign had done the same thing, would Jackson have sued?

Submitted by: pdk46@hotmail.com (Paul K., Phoenix, AZ)
Webmaster's Reply:

It is my understanding that Jackson did make such a request prior to the lawsuit. The ad was not removed until after the law suit was filed.

Russ



From your webmaster:

I will continue to post letters on the topic of Jackson's lawsuit against the McCain campaign for it's unauthorized use of "Running On Empty" and I will continue to post letters on both sides of the issue.

HOWEVER, I must ask that people refrain from vulgar or abusive language. I will NOT post any letter that has name-calling, cussing, or other derogatory language in it.

Also, I will not post letters than are simply name-calling and politics. This website is for dicussion of Jackson Browne and his music. To be posted, letters about the lawsuit should deal with the lawsuit without excessively bashing or praising candidates, which is off topic. Please find another website on which to post political messages.

MOST of the letters I am getting at the moment are all about politics, generally stating why one or the other of the candidates is going to bring the downfall of our country and democracy as we know it. Surely the apocalypse is coming if you believe even half the onslaught of email I have received in the past day. (I do NOT post the letters that are all about politics, the website is devoted to issue directly pertaining to Jackson Browne and his music.)

Some of the letters I'm getting regarding this issue are downright obnoxious. I'm trying to be fair with what I post on the website, but I won't post any letters with foul our abusive language... and that leaves out a lot of email... Why are people in this country so angry? It's really sad... and kind of scary.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I haven't e-mailed you since 2001 And my e-mail is different now. But, I am so pleased that you web site is still up. We saw Jackson Browne when he came to Houston and loved it. I have to say I haven't bought any more Browne music since then, but this new album looks and sounds great. I logged on to his official web site and we may travel to Biloxi to see him since my Brother lives in Gulfport.

I just wanted to send a note of sincere thanks that you have kept this going. Browne is a unique artist and really deserves more press than he gets; however, I don't think he really that concerned.

Thanks again.

Submitted by: seglorioso@comcast.net (Sandra)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hello,

A few days ago there was a pre-sale sale of tickets to the October 17 show at the Ameristar in Kansas City. While I was lucky to get two seats, I was disappointed they are in the balcony. I tried the next day to get better seats but the pre-sale had closed. I wish there was a way to get better seats. Pre-sale ticket buyers are probably die-hard fans and as such should get prime seats. As I understand it, the Ameristar is less than 1,400 seats so will probably have a great view. I'll probably wait until regular sales next time. I just hope there is a second time somewhere near Kansas City/St. Louis next year. I'd be willing to drive four - five hours for a show. As it stands now, I'll be driving three. Can't wait for the show.

Keep up the good work.

Submitted by: jpnacy@sockets.net (John)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Browne suing McCain over song use. What a surprise, a washed up artist that is going to sue to get money, and to go after that non-liberal non-tree hugging person. This country needs McCain instead of a radical

Submitted by: clarkselectric1@aol.com (Scott)
Webmaster's Reply:

Facts, issues and important legal rights get lost in the waves of hate...

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Go, Jackson! I'm glad you are resisting the political use of your classic song (by the McCain campain)! Keep up the great music and activism!

Submitted by: elspeth1031@comcast.net (Elspeth, Roseville, MN)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Kudos to Mr. Browne for defending what is his property. I am amazed at the stupidity of the campaign staff responsible for using copywrited music without permission. My understanding is that ABBA & John Melloncamp have also requested that their music be removed from McCain ads.

Submitted by: pat412@mac.com




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I'm stunned at how many angry letters you've received regarding Jackson's lawsuit over the unauthorized use of "Running on Empty". I've been a fan of his music and his integrity for over 30 years (even though I am a stauch Republican). While I usually disagree with him on political issues, I have always admired how Jackson has comported himself with regard to his beliefs. He has been firm and passionate, yet respectful. Yes, he is a Democrat and no, he most likely would not have authorized the use of his song in the ad, but this issue goes far beyond politics. It's about someone's right to choose how his products are used. Jackson owns his music which gives him the right to choose when and how it is used. Music is stolen in so many ways now; why are people complaining that a man is simply standing up for what is morally, ethically, and legally his?

Those of you who have thrown away your concert tickets and trashed your albums certainly have the right to do so, but I know if I only supported the art of those with whom I agreed, I would miss out on so much beautiful music, painting, literature, film, etc. Jackson's music opens the door for discussion...what better political avenue is there?

Submitted by: kdgilstrap@sbcglobal.net




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Russ--

I am shocked and saddened by some of the letters you have received bashing Jackson for the cardinal sin of standing up for his rights against people who don't seem to care about anything but winning the presidency. And many of these letters are not only bashing the lawsuit, but also include nasty personal attacks on Jackson's worth as an artist and a human being. Jackson has every right to protect his songs, especially against use by someone with values so opposed to those Jackson has worked so diligently to uphold all these years!

I would say to Jackson: Keep fighting the good fight!!!

Submitted by: kimmarlow@sbcglobal.net




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I just heard Jackson Browne is suing the Republican Party for allegedly using his song, "Running on Empty". I assume for this trivial action on his part, that he is truly running on empty. I was surprised by his actions and frankly it makes me happy that I will not be supporting Mr. Browne as he appears by his actions to think he is a whole lot better than he ever was! Good riddance, Mr. Jackson Browne.

Submitted by: mmangum993@hotmail.com




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hey Russ (and Carrie in Minnesota);

I'm sorry Carrie did not have a good ticket buying experience and I have absolutely no hints or suggestions for next time. (I probably should have kep my big mouth shut). It was only my second try at buying through Ticketmaster and I just got lucky. My seats aren't the best, but they're on the main floor and I am thankful to get them and to see Jackson in concert. As for all the hubub about Jackson suing McCain, what's the uproar? Just take some advice: "Lighten up while you still can and TAKE IT EASY!!"

Let the music keep our spirits high....

Submitted by: benson@bevcomm.net (Kevin still in Minnesota)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hey Russ,

I would like to encourage other Jackson Browne fans to not get too upset with some of the emails they see posted disparaging Jackson regarding his lawsuit against the McCain campaign. A lot of right-wing organizations encourage their supporters to submit disparaging remarks via the Internet whenever they can attack a Democratic politician or position. I do not believe that very many of these people are actually fans of Jackson, or are actually discarding CDs or concert tickets. They are just right-wing voices looking for a place to attack.

My other point is that Jackson's decision to take legal action to defend his intellectual property against copyright violations is very appropriate. Even if someone used his copyrighted material in a commercial to sell dog food (instead of in a political attack ad), it would be appropriate for Jackson to defend his copyright. The key point in this case is that the McCain campaign used copyrighted material without permission. It is a clear violation of the laws that protect the valuable intellectual property of creative Americans. It is a kind of theft. Jackson is right to pursue legal action.

I would also like to compliment you on the great restraint you have shown in your responses to various emails. For example, suggesting that one "upset" fan who indicated he would discard his collection of Jackson's recordings instead consider donating the CDs to a half-way house or orphanage was tremendously cool, and very much in the spirit of JB and his fans, in my opinion.

My wife and I have been JB fans since "Saturate Before Using," own copies all of his LPs and CDs, and have seen him play dozens of times in the U.S. and in Japan. We're really looking forward to "Time the Conqueror"!!!

Thanks for maintaining a great site!

Submitted by: flat5guitar@gmail.com (T&K)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi Russ,

Before any other word, thanks a million once more for your site. About JB controversy, I knew it would happen because JB late years attitudes seems to be closer to politics and far from art. I'm sorry but I think so and it was the cause I went out from the jb group several months ago. I have been JB fan for 36 years and I follow his artistic steps. He has the right to protect his copyrights but sincerely, do you believe that this is what he is doing? No absolutely not. JB has the intention to use his music to influence people in politics terms and that is what I cannot support. Art is art and I agree with someone who has told that art and religion don't combine with politics. Politic destroy art and I¥m afraid that JB art has been destroyed by his politics intentions. When I buy a JB record or attend to JB show, I want to hear or see his music nor his political opinions. It is sad to say it but I think the question is very clear comparing records. When Jackson whisper, his music is a miracle, when Jackson shout, his music disappear. Forgive my bad English.

Thanks for your wonderful job.

Submitted by: fermolo@telefonica.net (Fernando M.)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi,

I also am very disappointed in Jackson Browne. Like some of the others I think Jackson would be honored that John McCain and the RNC picked one of his songs, of all the songs they could have picked, but no, he's suing instead! I really have always loved Jackson Browne music, but personally, now I will turn him off my XM. When celebrities resort to suing over a song, it makes me think they've run out of money and they're desperate!?

Submitted by: thepresleys@cox.net (Gwynne in LA)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

How many of your fans do you think are REPUBLICANS???????????

Seriously, you need to get a life, your albums didnt come with a "for democrats only" sticker.....woops, guess I want my money back.

Submitted by: julie_jules27@yahoo.com




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Why is it always a copyright infringement when liberals disagree with the message? $75,000 for a suit is far less than what old JB is going to lose from fans that like his music but won't listen to it anymore. Telling John McCain not to use your song is one thing, suing is another. One less fan here isn't much, but it is a start! Don't believe it can happen to old JB, just go ask the Dixie Chicks! Never learn, do you?

Submitted by: imavenger4@yahoo.com (Lanny H.)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Russ,

I am sad I have to say I disagree with you. It is about politics. Mr. Browne said that he has spent a lifetime as a liberal and this tarnished his image.....WHAT? Are you serious, well then I guess me being a lifetime Republican could have my image tarnished if someone heard me listening to a Jackson Browne song. I am so tired of actors and musicians picking sides and making such a big deal over it. Just as I trashed my Dixie Chick CD's, have not seen a movie with Susan Sarandon, etc...my Jackson Brown CD's will suffer the same fate. You see the only power we as the buying public have is to not buy. We dont have a public platform to voice our opinion. Our opinion is voiced through our wallets. Maybe they will get the picture, we dont want to hear it! I like your music, your movie, what ever, I dont want to hear your views! Its sad that not only do we have to be divided through politics, but now the arts as well.

Submitted by: beddick3@comcast.net




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Always been a fan of Jackson Brown, loved his music and he's pretty good live. Everyone who knows him knows he's a big lefty. It never did matter because he just played music.

Lately he's become more political - it's sad when singers of his caliber need no inject their views on others instead of just doing what they know. Like we really care what we think of their politics!

Now he want to sue McCain because of he played one of his song in a commercial and he doesn't like the guy.

You're right Jackson Brown, people are getting the wrong impression, and it's not just you. It's all those "STARS" who have the need to politicize every.

I'm sick of the left and right playing these games and I'm sick of "STARS" inserting themselves in the process. Get over yourself Jackson Brown, the majority of fans don't listen to your music because you're a liberal, it's because of your music.

The nice thing about being a fan is you can quite anytime and I just can't take the B.S. - you just lost a fan Mr. Brown!

Yeah, I'll still listen to your music from time to time, but it won't be the same...

Submitted by: tpchilds@msn.com (Todd, Seattle, Wa.)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Dear Russ,

First I want to join the others who have thanked you for your marvelous website where us fans can check on the latest with respect to Jackson.

But mainly I wanted to write and tell you that I totally agree with your response to the individual who was disappointed in Jackson's lawsuit against the McCain campaign for the unauthorized use of his song "Running on Empty". I for one was glad to hear that Jackson did not "let it go" and had the courage to stand up and challenge McCain on his audaciousness. Hurray for Jackson and social justice! I'm sure that one of the things that Jackson is not happy about with respect to McCain is his endorsement of nuclear power. Jackson has been an anti-nuclear activist for over 30 years and I can imagine that he in no way wants to be associated with a political candidate who endorses this undesirable (in my view) power source.

Submitted by: marcellachiarello@msn.com (Marcella in Vermont)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Russ: Just read some of the negative letters on your web page. I am truly shocked that fans are threatening to throw tickets and CDs away over this lawsuit. They used Jackson's music without permission. He had to enforce and protect what is his. I believe Jackson pulled out of the cruise because of Jesse's ignorant comments. I truly don't think he wanted to be associated with the situation. I was disappointed but deep down inside I admired him for standing up for what he believed it. He really is a man of integrity.

Submitted by: somethingfinejb@yahoo.com (Mary)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi Russ,

WOW!!! I can not believe some of the letters people are writing you about McCain's improper use of ROE.

Jeez, this is supposed to be a "warm and fuzzy" site to talk about his music, shows, etc. You are a saint for putting up with some of this stuff.

I am just writing to again thank you for your tireless efforts dedicated to the running of this site and to show my support for you and your work....THANKS!!!

Submitted by: yank7fan@verizon.net (Ron)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

That's it for me. I've tossed my Jackson Browne CDs and albums (wasted money). I won't have anything to do with someone who sues over something so trivial.

One of the problems with this country is how "lawsuit happy" people are. There is no way Mr. Browne was hurt by his music being heard by hundreds/thousands of people. No thinking person believes every song used in these political ads/conventions is an endorsement one way or another. What's next? Do the listeners who don't agree with Mr. Brown need to be afraid he will sue them because their "endorsement" makes it seem that he agrees with "them"? I will no longer be a listener of Mr. Browne's pieces; God knows I wouldn't want to be accused of agreeing with "him".

I've taken his songs off of the school's playlists, and I am encouraging my family and friends to get rid of his stuff as well.

If artists (i.e., singers, actors, musicians) want to be supporters of a "side", they should do fundraisers, walk blocks and shake hands and spread the word, or make art in favor of their supported side. I will never support an artist who inserts him/herself into politics in such a negative way. Artists should allow the public to enjoy their work without the fear of "insulting" the artists with their own political views.

Submitted by: dbasham@kc.rr.com
Webmaster's Reply:

Jackson Brown did not express a political view and has not endorsed either candidate. He's just trying to enforce his copyright. Senator McCain's campaign people should have known better than to use copyrighted material without permission and hopefully he'll will fire whoever did so and get some more competent people around him.

The lawsuit is about copyright infringement. It is my understanding that copyrights can be lost due to failure of the owner of the copyright to enforce his ownership. If Jackson allows people to use his songs without restriction and without enforcing his copyright, he might well find the song(s) becoming part of the public domain and lose his ability to make a living with them. He'd be stupid not to enforce these rights.

I'm confused as to why it is "trivial" for someone to protect their copyright. These are rights that Senator McCain supports and will swear to uphold if he is elected President.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Subject: Suite against McCain.

You know as well as I do that if Obama used the same song clip nothing would be said. Its only because McCain is a Republican. Historically tell be one of the early founders of this country that had the liberal ideas of you sacred Jackson Browne. Jackson Browne would do himself a favor by following the blueprint of the founding fathers and not the liberal (unrealistic) ideology of Marxist thinkers. They all sound good on paper but fail to factor in human nature. Oh well... don't know why I bother.

Submitted by: tbertany@bellsouth.net (Tom B., Roswell. Georgia.)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Good Luck with the Lawsuit against the RNC and the McCain Campaign.

Hopefully, they will be "Running on Empty" come Nov. 4th.

Submitted by: rklowe@verizon.net




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hello Russ,

I was just reading the comments regarding the lawsuit Mr. Browne has filed against McCain and I think they are very sad. Why are you people so angry about this? Mr. Browne doesn't want his music being used by or associated with a party who's philosophies and beliefs aren't consistent with his. What's wrong with that? If he made his view clear to them and they did nothing, then maybe he feels that the lawsuit is necessary. And sue-happy? How many lawsuits has he been involved with? One or two? In all of his career.

If you can't be supportive because of your own beliefs, why not let it go? Don't burn or trash your albums and CDs. That's foolishness. And you may regret your actions later. The advice given by Russ about giving them to Goodwill, churches etc. would be the way to go, if you feel resigned to that type of action.

I really must say that I would never have thought that Jackson Browne fans could be so disloyal. Everyone is usually SO supportive. And I've been to another web site where they are discussing this very article and the comments and name-calling there is deplorable. And some of your names are used over there, too. Come on. Get over this. Anger leads to sorrow and regret.

Submitted by: shposts@aol.com (Shari)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Jackson Browne is no stranger to controversy (protesting Diablo Canyon in 1981, railing against Reagan political policy throughout in the eighties, publicly defending himself against scandalous personal attacks by a Daryl Hannah relative and by Joni Mitchell in the nineties, just a few examples that come to mind) nor to litigation (suing along with Jack Tempchin and Glenn Frey for back royalties on "Take It Easy"), so I applaud the fact that he has once again stood up for principles he believes in by suing John McCain and his campaign.

People who describe themselves as longtime fans and yet hurl invective and ad hominem attacks at Jackson, for doing that which surprises absolutely no one who really knows him, display an astounding unawareness of the biography of the man whose music they claim to admire. I don't recall anyone accusing Jackson of frivolous litigation or of vainglorious headline mongering when he co-sued for unpaid royalties on one of his hit singles just a few years back. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that a heated political campaign tends to bring out the callousness and insensitivity in everyone in a climate as politically polarized as the one we are now suffering through.

Obviously a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inductee and millionaire like Jackson Browne is doing this neither for the publicity nor the fame. I wonder how those who accuse the man of suing frivolously would feel if someone stole jewels from their house and then gave them to an enemy to wear in public-a perfectly analogous situation. I appreciate that Jackson still stands up both for his politics and for the integrity of the recording industry during an era in which both are in pitiful decline.

Submitted by: curtis.klinghoffer@lmunet.edu (Curt K.)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hey Russ-

I too applaud you for being so kind to all the angry "fans" who are so obsessed with partisan politics that they can't see the fault in copyright infringement. Any "fan" who threatens to throw away Jackson's albums because the man supports Obama, clearly hasn't been following Jackson much for the past thirty years! I can understand that suing for $75,000 may seem like a bit over the top, but the McCain camp deserves it if they were stupid enough to think Jackson Browne of all people would allow his classic song in a Republican commercial! I'm not that into politics, and if you ask me we'll be screwed with Obama or McCain. But seeing these droves of haters pop up because a man is looking for some compensation for his hard work, is pretty ridiculous. I, for one, will be first in line to buy "Time the Conqueror," and with any luck, Solo Acoustic, Volume III. And seeing the clowns the McCain campaign has for supporters, I'll be first in line on election day voting for Obama!

Good Riddance, former Jackson Browne "fans"!

Submitted by: brettmcmurdo@berkeley.edu




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Russ,

Interested persons might want to listen to this interview with Jackson's attorney regarding the McCain copyright infringement case:
http://thelegalbroadcastnetwork.squarespace.com/the-lbn-blog/2008/8/15/jackson-browne-files-lawsuit-against-mccain.html

Regarding the issue of damages, the attorney mentions as legal precedent a case a few years ago in which Tom Waits sued Frito Lay--not for using Waits' actual voice, or even Waits' actual sound recording--just for imitating Waits' voice too closely in a commercial.

The result? The jury awarded Waits $2.5 million dollars!

And this was just a potato chip company. Not someone running for a position in which he would be sworn to uphold the United States Constitution.

Very interesting.

Best regards,

Submitted by: flat5guitar@gmail.com (T&K)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi

Look, I have been a Jackson Browne fan for quite some time. Although I have NEVER agree with his political views I can still see that he has a talent for writing good music. This suing McCain and the RNC is a bunch of bull****!!! Jackson should be honored that someone has acknowledged one of his songs by using it in a campaign!! This is completely a political issue. Come on, seriously, we all know that Jackson Browne is a hard core liberal (unfortunately) and would do anything to not be associated with the Republican Party. In no case will Jackson win this lawsuit. I can't even believe Jackson would care that much; I always thought he was better then that...well that's what you get for being a liberal!!

This issue is bothering me a lot about how I feel about Jackson. I mean, one of my idols in my life is President Reagan, which is most definitely one of Jackson's most hated persons...so you can see how much this is bothering me. Jackson and I just have completely different views on politics. Unfortunately, there is not much to do about this. I love pretty much every song that he has made (besides his political one's) and I will continue to listen to his music. I'm trying very hard to not let this issue go over my head.

Plus, before any of this stuff happened I purchased 2 tickets for his up coming concert in NYC! I, for some reason am going to go because I know that he will have made another great album and plus they are really good seats!!

Anyway, please Jackson let this go because if you don't you are going to lose your case and make yourself look like a fool and LOSE MANY MANY of your life long fans!!

P.S. By the way, I AM voting for McCain!

Submitted by: burberrybaby102@aol.com
Webmaster's Reply:

You wrote: "In no case will Jackson win this lawsuit." Obviously you know nothing about copyright law. This case is a slam-dunk for Jackson. The McCain campaign failed to get a license for use of Jackson's song, and never even bothered to ask for one.

You wrote: "I can't even believe Jackson would care that much." Why not? Don't you care about your rights? Wouldn't you stand up for yourself if someone was violating your rights? Jackson's music is how he makes his living. If a real estate developer suddenly had squatters on his property, wouldn't he have the right to throw them out so he could rent the property and make a living? Or shouldn't he care that much? If a motion picture studio is having their films stolen by pirated DVDs, shouldn't they be entitled to stop the pirated DVDs and sell official copies? Or shouldn t they care so much?

I certainly DO understand how an artist's actions can effect how a person hears their music. Other artists have done things that have made me put aside their music for a time... but I've always gotten over it. I don't have to agree with an artist's political views to like their music.

The bigger issue here is still the complete lack of respect our society has for intellectual property rights, which derive directly from the U.S. Constitution. Certainly a U.S. Senator and a candidate for President should surround himself with people who respect the Constitution, which he will swear to uphold if he is elected to the office.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

great start to a Sunday morning, what a kick I've gotten reading these "I'm so shocked" letters!

not wanting to denigrate "low information" readers of jb, but come on....are y'all serious?

I found it profoundly amusing that one, a McCain staffer was a jb fan, and two, they would have the temerity to use a jb song under one of their ads; oil and water, by definition

a kid who doesn't want to be told no just simply doesn't ask permission, and so, it is up to the adult to monitor the child's behavior

Jackson is just being an adult, monitoring bad behavior

get over it, y'all

Submitted by: mitch-brown@webtv.net




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hey Russ,

I just wandered over to your site and read some of the anti-Jackson stuff and although I don't post publically, I wanted to thank you for your patience with some of these people. I agree with you 100%, this is a little scary. Scary that people just need to see their words in print, no matter how ridiculous, and sad that I think they actually believe what they are writing.

I support Jackson's decision to sue. I am grateful that your patience has not made "our side" look like a bunch of illiterate fools.

Hang in there, buddy, you're doing a great job.

Submitted by: anonymous




From your webmaster:

Before writing in on the topic of the lawsuit, PLEASE take a few minutes and go to:
www.speakingofjustice.com/kickapps/_Scott-Drake-Larry-Iser-on-Jackson-Brownes-Lawsuit/audio/174432/23913.html

It's well worth listening to and explains the case far better than any article I've read.

I will continue to post letters on this topic through the end of this month, but not beyond that. After that time, I'd appreciate it if everyone could get back to the music.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I have been reading a lot of political blogs this year. Predominant Right to Left claims: the left whines and disregards facts. The fact is: They didn't get permission to use Jackson Browne's music, they infringed on his copyright. So he does the decent act first: asks them to remove the song. Their response is both glib and disrespectful. Note: Being wrong is one thing, but one should never be wrong and disrespectful concurrently.

Another thing the right often claims: The left mocks their lifestyle. The fact is that regardless if Jackson Browne is an Obama supporter or not, the fact is he is an environmentalist. By using Jackson's art to mock a "gas saving tip" by Obama is equivalent to using Jackson's art to mock his own lifestyle. Let's hypothetically say that Nancy Pelosi (I mean Nancy Pelosi's people) decided to use Ted Nugent's "Cat Scratch Fever" as a suggestion that we should use cats instead of guns -- do you think Ted Nugent would let sleeping dogs lie?

Regardless of the legal implications -- this shows a lack of both character and intelligence. It is obvious that McCain's camp lacks both morals and character. If this is the type of "leadership from the top" we can expect for 4 to 8 years from Senator McCain -- If he becomes President of the United States, I imagine we will be in a world of trouble come 2012.

And for all of you tossing your concert tickets, could you let me know where you live or where you are tossing them? After all, times are tough and I'd like to have them.

Submitted by: anonymous




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Dear Russ,

I'm so sorry that you've had to deal with hateful letters and foul language as the owner of the JB Fans website. I'm quite sure that flat5guitar is right when he/she points out that these emaisl are probably from McCain supporters who have been directed to this website to leave anti-JB comment, and are not in fact actual fans. Throwing his cd's in the garbage is as inconsistent with his beliefs as supporting a Republican candidate is, so I don't know why they wouldn't have dropped him before this if they were, in fact, real fans. Anyway, you do an amazing job keeping the rest of us up to date with what is happening, and putting up with all the rudeness on our behalf.

I must admit I don't understand the contention that art and politics should be kept seperate. Art is fundamentally a form of self-expression; a means through which people communicate their ideas and emotions. If the subject of those ideas and emotions is restricted to things that have nothing to do with politics, it limits the artist and confines the art. Artists are valued because of their ability to communicate complex concepts and nuanced emotions in ways that nobody else can, so it doesn't make sense to confine those expressions to a restricted range of topics, since that then circumscribes the conversation that can be generated through appreciation of the art. In addition, we're talking about a very intelligent, thoughtful artist when we talk about Jackson Browne. It really doesn't make sense to try to tell smart people that they need to stick to singing songs about love and loss and, and not express their thoughs about politics. Bright people should get involved and stay involved because it adds to the quality of the dialogue about all things, not just politics.

Thanks again for everything you do. I think YOU should run for office!

Submitted by: lapinpdoo@gmail.com (LP)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi Russ, I'd appreciate it if you would post this.

I have 2 extra tickets (hard tix @FACE VALUE) to Jackson Browne's show at the United Palace Theater (175th St & Broadway NYC), Sat 9/20 @ 8pm.

Lower Loge---Row E---Seats---14&16---$194/pair.

Please email Lucy @ lucysoll@yahoo.com if interested, thanks.

Thank you,

Submitted by: lucysoll@yahoo.com (Lucy)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hey Russ, Please let everyone know that the tickets for the Beau Rivage tickets Oct. 26 are not for sale through ticketmaster. They can be purchased through BeauRivage.com or a phone number listed on that site. Thanks

p.s. they went on sale yesterday

Submitted by: roberson.renee@sbcglobal.net




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

I will try to put this in terms that people will understand. For all of you former "fans" that think Jackson should be more than glad to give McCain use of his song, keep in mind, the song is his property. It is stealing, plain and simple. It would be the same as if I came to your house, and took your car without permission. Wouldn't you sue me? Of course you would, and I wouldn't blame you, I did you wrong. But don't think it's just a black/white political issue. Jackson is very careful what he chooses to endorse, whether it be political or whatever.

As far as some of you complaining about not getting the greatest seats at the concerts: I wonder how many of you that are going to the concerts only have to drive downtown, or even an hour to get there. My wife and I had to drive to Louisville for the Solo Acoustic Concert back in March, and will be driving to St. Louis in October for this tour. Both cities are over three hours from where we live. Just because you've gotten great seats before, doesn't mean you are automatically entitled. Let someone else have a turn so that they can have the same enjoyable concert experience that you had with your great seats.

Well, I'm Late for the Sky, so I will close for now. Later!

PS Enjoy the site, Russ, keep up the good work!

Submitted by: wiseguy840@aol.com (Carl)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hey Russ,

Like many of my fellow Jackson Browne fans I'm really quite taken aback at some of the comments made on this site since the news broke about Jackson's suit against John McCain, the National Republican Committee and the Ohio GOP. It's quite obvious that some are speaking with their political heart and not their intellectual head.

Copyright infringement is a very serious issue in the post-Napster era. I don't understand why this is such a murky issue for some, other than the fact they're looking at this as a stab at their candidate as opposed to a legal issue for an artist. Metallica received the same type of treatment when they took on Napster.

Ask John Fogerty how he felt about the value of song copyrights after he had those same rights "stolen" for every classic song he had ever written. Ask the same question to all the old bluesman who were never even afforded those rights. We should ask ourrselves how we would feel if we created something only to have someone use it without our permission in a way we never intended in front of millions of people.

Have you ever had the TV on in the background while you were doing something else and heard an old tune come on only to look up and see it was a commercial for tennis shoes?! I would think it would be embarrassing for the artist who wrote the song if they never wanted their song used in such a way. One of the surviving members of The Doors (John Densmore I think) is the only holdout to selling the rights to The Doors catalog for that very reason stating that as long as he is alive he will never allow Jim Morrison s lyrics to be used in such a manner. The songs and lyrics are a form of art, not jingles to be used at the indiscretion of a marketing firm or a politician for that matter.

As always Russ, thanks for the great site and the manner in which you let all voices be heard. As a fan of Jackson's and the Webmaster of this site you could easily create a biased forum, but true to the ideals this country was founded on and your sense of fair play - you do not. Jackson would be proud. You have handled this uproar with complete class. God bless you for all you do for us fans.

Hopefully we can all move past this, "with [our] maps and [our] faith in the distance... moving farther on."

Submitted by: jbfan0880@yahoo.com




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

An English perspective on burning your Jackson cds and tickets. Are you all mad? Bush is the least popular president in histoet this side of the water and comments of a war mongersing nature attributed to Mcain in the British press would mean he would follow in the same vain.

Jackson is nearly as famous for his liberal views as he is for his amazing music. Why would he be expected to accept an extreme right wing usage of one of his famous songs! That is without considering the copyright infringement involved. Those of you suggesting he can't win a law suit can't have any knowledge of copyright law. He is bound to win it and good on him. Don't forget that as long as anyone can remember Jackson has been giving his time and love to all manner of great charitable causes and the attacks on him from some of you so called fans is very upsetting.

I have tickets for 2 Irish shows next year and several English ones and can't wait to see him and to hear the new album. I'm guessing there will be a few political utterings on it given the current climate. Anyway. Shame on those of you being so vitriolic, especially to Russ who does sterling work on behalf of us all

Let the music keep our spirits high

Take it easy

Submitted by: a1terrybaker@aol.com (Terry)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Dear Russ,

You really do a great job with the JB fan site, but I have a suggestion. Would it be too much trouble to make a separate link in the "Letters" section for the current political debate. That way people wanting to actually discuss music and concert-going wouldn't have to wade through so much other stuff to find it.

About the current political issue: Anyone wanting to dispose of their Jackson Browne tickets or memorabilia can send those to me. I would truly appreciate getting to go to another of his concerts. I have always loved Jackson's music, but I truly respect him as a person BECAUSE he ALWAYS stands up for what he believes in. He's been doing it since before most of you even heard of him. That is who he is. Jackson has a very strong sense of values.

Companies pay millions of dollars every day for endorsements to sell their product. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who will choose which product to buy or vote for a candidate because a celebrity endorsed it. McCain (& his publicity team) is trying to sell himself to you. ANY celebrity will sue a corporation for that. Jackson should have the right to choose if he wants to endorse a candidate or not. It's called Free Choice.

Several years ago he refused to allow a well-known oil company to use that same song because he didn't want to LOSE the MEANING of the song. That had nothing to do with politics.

BTW, my stand here has nothing to do with how I plan to vote, it's about what I believe is right and what I believe is wrong. Do you want a person who (directly or indirectly) disregards YOUR rights to be the president of this country? I don't know who will win this election, but I don't think it will be the American people either way.

About the fans: I had heard that Jackson had really great fans, but that's not what I'm seeing here. Last spring people were complaining because they didn't get FRONT ROW seats and stated that they had ALWAYS had front row seats before. To them I'd like to say, "Maybe it's someone else's turn to have a good seat. Why do you think you're so much better than the rest of us anyway?" As far as the people criticizing Jackson for his choices and saying negative things about the current status of his career, this is supposed to be a place for FANS, which implies that you either like his music or like him as a person. Some of the messages I saw posted here do not sound like fans at all, especially since you haven't even heard his latest work. Jackson may not be "The Latest Greatest Hot Newcomer" that this business values so much, but this is a business where many people who have held that position fell out of it (and the music business altogether) within 3 years.

About the MUSIC: I heard that he's really happy with the way his new album sounds. I can't wait to hear it! I think the LP option is really cool too.

I also think it is really cool that he offers a fan presale and doesn't charge extra for the presale seats. I know of one musician who offers a presale through the fan club which charges a fee to join, (you must join to be able to get in on the presale) and then charges about twice as much for the tickets as the public sale seats, and when the presale starts there are only ~ 20 seats available so you might not get one. Personally, I think the real ticketing problem is with the people who use automated systems to grab the good seats who's only intention in buying them is to resell them at a huge profit. If you, the fans, refused to buy those seats and those people had to eat the money they spent on them, they would stop doing it and you and I would get better seats at the price established by the act and the venue.

I'm sorry that so many of you have had a bad day. Were you having a bad day BEFORE you heard that Jackson was suing to get his song removed from the political ad? I'm guessing you were, because unless you were on the committee that made that decision, it doesn't really affect you and shouldn't upset you so much. When I'm having a bad day, I turn on the Jackson Browne music and it makes me feel better. You should try it!

I hope your day gets better!

Submitted by: jdthird@aol.com (Julie)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi Russ, I have to tell you, since all these folks are getting on Jackson for the McCain lawsuit, about an incident that occurred when Jackson was performing in Ames Iowa in November 2003 during the Solo Acoustic tour. Jackson was getting ready to go into Lives in the Balance and started talking about George Bush and the shape this country was in, etc., and said that he didn't know about the rest of us, but that he was going to do everything he could to make sure George Bush was not re-elected in 2004. The place broke into cheers and applause, and when it died down two young women stood up and yelled at Jackson that they were going home to burn his CDs and they walked out. Everyone applauded them out the door, and when that died down, Jackson chuckled and said, "Well, uh, I guess I'm just happy that they bought them!! They can do whatever they want with them now!"

I am always amazed when people who are "fans" of Jackson get upset when they discover that his politics don't blend with theirs. Have they been listening?

The suggestion that he should let it go, even appreciate the mis-use of his music, because it means someone is listening is condescending. He doesn't lie down. And the McCain campaign should have known better. It was bad business, at best.

Take care Russ, and thanks for standing up for individual rights. Keep it up!!

Submitted by: hock@midlands.net




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Tell Jackson to just chill,smoke another joint, and write a new song on his endangered wood species guitar.

Submitted by: satrk@aol.com
Webmaster's Reply:

These are the types of letters that make me wonder how much I should sensor the letters that come in. Obviously the person who wrote this letter knows nothing about Jackson Browne and what he stands for. And certainly I wonder in many of the above letters criticizing Jackson Browne for enforcing his copyrights (with some exceptions) seem to be from people who are not fans at all but merely supporters of Senator McCain's campaign for president who are blindly loyal and believe that attacking anyone who doesn't believe what they do somehow is helpful to their candidate.

The fact is that this is my personal website and I RESERVE COMPLETE DISCRETION as to the letter's appropriateness to be posted. Also, I reserve the right to edit the content of letters. Having said that, I'm a strong believer in FREE SPEECH, and have done my best to post letters that reflect both sides of the issue over Jackson's recent lawsuit to protect his copyrights on a song that is as closely associated with him as any in his 40+ years as a singer-songwriter.

FACT: Jackson Browne has been ANTI-DRUGS for many years. In the 1980s he re-wrote the lyrics to the song "Cocaine" and has performed them in concert ever since. The words reflect this anti-drug stance:
There was damage to the body
Damage to the soul
Damage to the quality of the Rock n' Roll
And the years spent stumbling around
half knowing something that something was wrong

And it don't help now, but you can look back and see
how some of us damaged are creativity
And there are good friends of mine that are dead and gone
He's been performing these lyrics since the mid-1980s. Jackson has also been involved in interventions to help some of his friends get off their own drug addictions.

FACT: Jackson Browne uses "green" guitars. He's been a top environmentalist for decades and he practices what he preaches. There are many guitar manufacturers today that ARE aware of the environmental problems associated with rare tropical woods and are experimenting with alternative woods from sustainable forests.

The worlds first environmentally friendly guitars, the Gibson SmartWoodCM line, were introduced at a sold-out concert featuring Jackson Browne, Rosanne Cash, Lisa Loeb, Carly Simon and many others at City Center Theater in New York City on October 17, 1997. Performing artists played Gibson SmartWood guitars, which are made from wood harvested under strict environmental standards and certified by the Rainforest Alliances SmartWood Program. That's at least how long Jackson has been caring about the wood in his guitars.

Some articles on this subject can be found at: www.musicwood.org, www.rainforest-alliance.org, www.ecorazzi.com, and www.acfnewsource.org. (Jackson Browne is specifically mentioned in the first 3 of these.)

So I had some reservations about posting this rather snide and ill-informed remark, but I'm letting it slide this time. As I said above, I will not post letters about the lawsuit after the end of this month. This space is for FAN LETTERS about the MUSIC of Jackson Browne, and not a place for politics or nasty remarks.

Russ



GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

It's sad to hear so much venom and hatred when discussing politics.

[Political discussion edited out.]

I applaud Jackson for standing up and protecting his copyrighted material, that is obviously his right. I'm not sure why some people refuse to concede this fact. I have always admired his passion for speaking out when he sees injustice for those less fortunate.

It would be nice if McCain just stood up and said it was wrong for his campaign to use the song without permission. And it would be nice if Jackson would accept an apology and that was the end. Maybe a small donation to a worthy cause, probably not going to happen without judicial intervention.

[More political discussion/opinion edited out.]


Submitted by: petegolf99@yahoo.com




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

It seemed inevitable that McCain supporters would go online and seek out any forum available to attack Jackson's decision to stand up for his legal rights. It's not always easy to sit by and listen to people who try to morph something as basic as this case of copyright violation into a political vendetta. Was part of the reason Jackson decided to sue based on the fact that he doesn't support McCain or much of what he stands for? Probably. Would there have been a different result if it were an Obama ad using, say, "For America" in a spot without permission. Maybe. But the point is, it's Jackson's music and he has a right to protect it just as much as anyone who becomes aware that something they worked for is being stolen away from them by persons with no right to it. I've followed Jackson's career for decades, and if there are two things I know he detests, it's hypocrisy and injustice of any kind. It's in his music, it's in the countless benefits he performs each and every year and yes, it's in his politics. Doesn't it make sense that a man so willing to stand and be counted in efforts to protect the rights of others would do the same for his own? Wouldn't you? Honestly, people, wouldn't you??

Russ, for so many years you've given us a wonderful place to visit and enjoy. This past week has been a little rocky, and you've handled it beautifully. Please know that you have the affection, gratitude and respect of thousands of people who count on you for a place to recharge. In some ways, it's hard for me to think about Jackson Browne, his art and career as separate from all of your wonderful efforts. Thank you.

Submitted by: jcbergeron2180@yahoo.com (John B., St. Paul)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Dear Russ,
Several years ago I was at a benefit concert (I think it was for congresswoman Lois Capps or maybe her husband who preceded her) at the Santa Barbara Bowl featuring Jackson and Bonnie Raitt and heard several guys yelling about how they wished Bonnie would just play her songs and forget all the political stuff. Go figure.

I was shocked over all the recent letters damning JB for his lawsuit against McCain. What rock did these people crawl out from under and why are they even looking at your site?--especially the letter writers that spout about how JB hasn't had a hit in years and that he's washed out. JB's music has never been about hits--has he ever even had a number one apart from "Take it Easy?"

I'm looking forward to JB's new album--pre-ordered and tour--he's at the Arlington theatre in SB Oct. 3.

On another note, I recently downloaded Glen Campbell's new version of "These Days" and it's not too bad.

As always, thanks for the great site and [Political comment edited out.]

Submitted by: allie08227@yahoo.com (Allie)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi Russ,

I am genuinely shocked at some of the letters I am reading on your message board. Are people that wound up about this that they're prepared to throw out their Jackson Browne CDs and concert tickets? First of all, the bottom line is this is a copyright issue, and as an artist he can't make a living if people use his songs without permission. Furthermore, I am surprised that his "Republican Fans" are at all shocked by his objection to John McCain using his songs. Jackson has been known for his liberal views for many years. Do these same republican fans object to "Lives In the Balance" or "World In Motion"? His scathing attacks on Reaganism mirror his stance on Bush in "The Naked Ride Home". For his song to appear in a Republican ad would be inconsistent with the attitude that he has maintained for many many years regarding his political views. People should not be at all surprised by his actions or his political views. The vast majority of the letters you have received from people are filled with the emotion of the moment and others are from people who are genuinely misinformed.

I'll step off my soapbox now. The bottom line is we're here to talk about his MUSIC, not to enter into a hostile political debate (there is more than enough hostility in the current election, the Iraq war, the Russian invasion of Georgia). I'm looking forward to his new album (aside from the cover - not his best look in my opinion), and also hope that he comes back to Canada sometime soon.

Submitted by: benstone@magma.ca




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Exactly! Good point--why would people who think like that, who would call Jackson washed up, who would be critical of him for not having a "hit", be looking at this website anyway? This has been gnawing at me. While I found it really hard to believe that people would flock to this website in order to pose as disillusioned fans and criticize him for standing up for himself in order to make their political statement, it actually makes more sense that THAT is the case than to think that people who really ARE fans, the kind of fans who know about and frequent this website, would suddenly turn cold against him for protecting his intellectual property!

Ah! Now I can sleep! My mind kept asking, "Who ARE these people?"

Now I'm going to go find that Glen Campbell version of These Days! BTW, I agree about the new cover not being Jackson's best look...but I'll probably spend some time staring at it anyway...

Thanks, Russ!!! You are a clear thinker and stayed above the fray. Your patience was impressive as you kept bringing people back around to the real point.

Sign me Anonymous, please, if you choose to print.

Submitted by: Anonymous




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Mr Paris; I hadn't been on the fan website since early last week; I just looked in and I could not believe all the letters!!! I was blown away by the responses to Jackson's Lawsuit against the McCain campaign. I want to commend you for steering (as much as you CAN steer) the messages BACK to the music. This forum was set up as a site for fans who enjoy J. B.'s music and concerts and it is titled as such. All the scathing comments are showing who are fans and who are not. You have been the voice of reason and you have done an outstanding job on your comments. That has been a daunting task & I hope you continue doing what you are doing. Awesome work man!!

Submitted by: rrangel@bmcwest.com (Rick R.)




GENERAL FAN COMMENTS:

Hi Russ,

I bet Jackson Browne's recent lawsuit against the McCain campaign will have a lot of support from fans, not only in the US, but also from other countries. The lawsuit was reported by Volkskrant (newspaper) in The Netherlands.

Jackson Browne's music is not judged by hits, any real followers of his music can testify this. I am really looking forward to his new cd, and of course, his forthcoming European tour between April 15 to May 15, 2009!

If my younger sister has her luck, she might be able to attend JB's first ever concert when she comes to visit me next April/May from Hong Kong.

Thanks for the good work!

Submitted by: northpoint1417@hotmail.com (C. H. Mak, a Hong Kong Chinese living in The Netherlands)




Go To Jackson Browne Fan Letters and Reviews from September 2008

RETURN to Jackson Browne Fan Letters Page

RETURN to Jackson Browne Home Page